Written by: Dr Peter Hammond
Article Source: Africa Christian Action

The proposed Promotion of Equality and the Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Amendment Bill (PEPUDA) is a Serious Threat to Religious Freedom.

We have serious concerns about how this Bill could undermine our Constitutional Rights to freedom of religion, belief and opinion, freedom of expression, freedom of association and interfere with our freedoms of conscience before God to be free from unwarranted interference by the state and political entities.

It would appear that this Bill could be used to dictate to religious people and institutions what we may, or may not, say, what we may, or may not, do and what we may, or may not, believe. It is not acceptable that any political institutions interfere in the religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

It is unacceptable, unworkable and unconstitutional that people and institutions of faith could be subjected to time and money wasting court cases simply because someone else chooses to take offence by what one may, or may not, say or do.

Subjective opinion and perceptions can lead to a wide variety of interpretations. It could also lead to an overwhelming flood of litigations that could tie up our legal system, which is already overwhelmed and backlogged, into chaotic competing lawsuits.

We are concerned that the Bill broadens the definition of equality to mean, amongst other things, “equal rights and access to resources, opportunities, benefits and advantages”. This proposed definition of equality goes further than the Constitution. It is dangerously overbroad and therefore unconstitutional.

We are further concerned that the Bill changes the definition of discrimination to mean something completely different to what the ordinary person understands these words to mean. To change discrimination to also mean a subjective perception where someone can take their emotional reaction to attribute motives to someone who may have never even intended any such harm, or discrimination. To effectively punish people for saying, or doing, things they did not know to be wrong and where there was no intention to break the law is a radical departure from the rest of our law.

The Bill in its present form does not distinguish between fair discrimination and unfair discrimination. Any free society allows choices and preferences. To effectively make the accused guilty until proven innocent is unjust and unconstitutional.

To place the burden of proof on the one accused is in violation of the innocent until proven guilty principle long established in law.

The Bill, in its present form, provides for employers to be jointly liable for any perceived discrimination by their employees. This is manifestly unjust. It is virtually impossible for any employer to foresee, or prevent every action, or comment, by every employee, in all circumstances.

The Bill represents an attempted revolution in South Africa’s legal system requiring all laws, policies, codes and practices to get in line with and give effect to the radical ideological objectives and new overbroad definition of equality represented by this Bill.

This Bill represents a serious threat to freedom and a potential weapon for abuse and persecution of individuals, organizations, churches and ministries who may disagree with politicians and their statements.

This Bill imposes onerous financial obligations on community-based organizations, ministries and churches to allocate money from their budgets to implement measures to promote what this Bill now defines as equality and to eliminate discrimination, in the radical senses defined by this Bill. This is a financial impossibility for faith-based organizations, with designated funds and depending on donations by their members.

In effect this Bill threatens communist government type coercion to compel conformity to political ideology. It is unnecessary, unworkable and unconstitutional and for this reason we strongly oppose the Bill and call for the scrapping of this potentially disastrous Bill in its entirety.

Click here to KEEP UPDATED on the latest news by subscribing to our FREE weekly newsletter.


Date published: 17/06/2021
Feature image: Image for illustrative purposes only.
Dr Peter Hammond is a missionary who, during his 40+ years of pioneering missions throughout Africa, has been involved in holding government accountable and informing the public on such matters. Visit frontlinemissionsa.org and savotersguide.org.

DISCLAIMER
JOY! News is a Christian news portal that shares pre-published articles by writers around the world. Each article is sourced and linked to the origin, and each article is credited with the author’s name. Although we do publish many articles that have been written in-house by JOY! journalists, we do not exclusively create our own content. Any views or opinions presented on this website are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. 

3 COMMENTS

  1. As here in America under the biblically egregious Constitutional Republic and its First Commandment violating First Amendment, this appears to be but the consequent of religious freedom for the destruction of Christian liberty.

    Christians who promote religious freedom are their own worst enemies!

    Regardless where its found, Religious Freedom and Christian Liberty are NOT the same thing. In fact, Christian Liberty (aka biblical dominion) was sacrificed on the altar Religious Freedom.

    Without the parameters of the Bible’s moral law, the First Amendment (or anything comparable anywhere else) has proven to be a toxic brew. For example, Amendment 1 condemns the prohibition of speech, whether spoken or written. Does the Bible provide for free speech or does it limit speech? What about freedom of speech and freedom of the press as it concerns Yahweh Himself? Does God grant us freedom to curse Him or blaspheme His name?

    On the other hand, freedom of speech and freedom of the press is used to provide protection for those who promote false religions, in utero infanticide, sodomy, drug abuse, violence, obscenities, and other abominations condemned by Yahweh.

    The provision in Amendment 1 for United States citizens to assemble peaceably appears innocuous. But is it harmless to give sodomites, infanticide advocates, and Satanists the right to assemble peaceably? If you are a proponent of the Constitution and a defender of Amendment 1, you must also champion the rights of such criminals and anti-Christians to assemble and promote their wicked agendas.

    Homosexuals and infant assassins claim freedom of speech and the right to assemble to combat Christians who speak out or assemble against these heinous people and their brazen debauchery. By labeling what Christians do as hate crimes, these immoral people are able to employ Amendment 1 against Christians speaking and/or assembling against these atrocities.

    According to the Bill of Rights, it is the alleged religious right of these sodomites, baby killers, and Satanists to use Amendment 1 against Christians.

    For more, see Chapter 11 “Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Books page and scroll down to Chapter 11.

  2. Even God gave zhis people permission to turn to the pagans,
    Religion
    He showed the way thru Christ His Salvation for all
    So who dares that anyone can make it a law when The Lord God Almighty gives us a free will!!!

Comments are closed.